The Kuala Lumpur High Court Judge Datuk Abdul Aziz Abd Rahim’s ruling that affirms the legitimacy of Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar as the Menteri Besar of Perak is the first ray of light that spells the end of the 1BLACKMalaysia.
The political crisis however would not be over until fresh elections are called. I would continue wearing black until the Assembly is dissolved.
I am humbled by the support from my family, friends, colleagues, students and fellow Malaysians whom I may not have met. Thanks.
If 1BLACKMalaysia was a matter of opinion on the morning of May 5th, it is now a fact. By denying the citizens their right to wear black, Najib’s boys and girls have painted 1Malaysia BLACK and flushed his million-dollar PR campaign down the drains. He should get someone smarter before they cost him more.
In fact, Najib’s boys and girls may have just helped popularise the idea of civil disobedience.
While wearing black is not the first instance of civil disobedience, and even the 1BLACKMalaysia is not the first instance of political mourning in black, the idea of civil disobedience is indeed at its core.
How did Nizar win Bukit Gantang when UMNO was expected to win a slight majority of the Malay votes and the polling day on Tuesday prevented many Chinese who had returned for graveyard visit (Qing Ming) from staying on?
This was perhaps the answer. Most Malaysians who do not read Chinese may not have seen this advertisement which appeared on the local section of the major Chinese newspapers on April 4 (Qing Ming Day, Saturday).
EC Chairperson Abdul Aziz met representatives from both the BN and PR. However, no substantial issues on electoral reform have been discussed. It was very much a waste of time.
This was BERSIH’s press statement issued on April 22, which was not reported by many media, the exceptions are The Nut Graph, Malaysiakini and Merdeka Review:
The Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (BERSIH) warns the Election Commission (EC) Chairperson Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof that his position would be untenable if he continues to act like a Barisan Nasional (BN) election agent.
BERSIH reminds Abdul Aziz that he is constitutionally duty-bound to ensure free, fair and clean elections, his job is not to prevent elections and by-elections especially when it looks like BN cannot ensure victory.
As elections — including by-elections — are core to a representative democracy, EC must not propose any changes to deprive voters of their right to decide who they want to represent them.
If the principle of “no taxation without representation” is violated, a government which collects tax revenue will be reduced to nothing but a mafia outfit which extorts protection money from the people.
BERSIH urges the EC to instead push for the lifting of Article 48(6) which bars an elected representative from re-contesting for five years after resigning from the seat.
Elections are like job interviews. An employee has the right to resign and seek reappointment under different conditions. Whether or not s/he would be employed should be left to his/her prospective employer.
BERSIH demands that all state officers observe administrative neutrality. If Abdul Aziz cannot control his partisan behaviour, he should just quit his job. He can then work full-time as a BN election agent or lead a lobby group advocating for the abolition of elections.
Abdul Aziz’s earlier statement that he will study the possibility of not having a by-election in Penanti — right after Najib gave the excuse of by-election fatigue — shows that the Election Commission is a parrot that echoes BN’s opinions.
Also, the Election Commission’s insistence on studying and deciding if a seat is vacant rather than accepting the Legislature Speaker’s judgment, in Perak and now in Penanti, is both partisan and malicious.
Lastly, Abdul Aziz’s earlier comment that the voting pattern in Kuala Sepetang was worrying was also gravely inappropriate and uncalled for. The EC’s job is to administer elections, not make patronizing, partisan and unsolicited advice on the outcome of elections.
Brian Yap wrote a wonderful piece reminding us that elections should begin at the grassroot level.
“APRIL 23 — There’s little doubt that Malaysians are far more politically conscious today. We regularly discuss political developments, we’re up to date on the latest scandals, and we’ve all sent or received text messages or e-mails that touch on Malaysian politics, solicited or otherwise. Plus, it seems as if a new blogger is coming on board every single day, from teenagers to retired old uncles, writing about the many issues that affect the nation.
These are all good things. They offer a glimmer of hope for the nation, and reflect the patriotism of Malaysians better than a million mini-flags on cars ever could.
Yet, at the same time there’s also a sense that for all our heightened political awareness, our everyday lives have remained largely the same. We read about the changes taking place more than we actually feel or see them….. more“
It’s important that we feel changes are taking place in our daily life.
Being empowered must be felt, not just understood or believed.
I see what happened at Bukit Lanjan as a fantastic sign, but more are needed. We need new political culture of participatory democracy, rule of law, accountability, transparency, citizen initiatives, civil disobeidence ……
Democratization needs bridging social capital, and cannot depend on a few political elites. I feel uncomfortable recently listening to a popular opposition politician telling people what they should do but keeping his own cards close to his chest.
War-making and state-making [are] organized crimes. – Charles Tilly.
We have been told once and again, elections are disruptive and wasteful, and now, bad for economy!
Why are elections a must?
Why must we have elections to decide our governments?
Why can’t we opt for horse-trading amongst lawmakers, palace coup, the rule of judges, military coup, police mutiny, bureaucracy mutiny or mob rule ala Thailand’s People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) as alternatives to topple and install governments?
Provided the people do not protest, these methods may well be much more smooth, efficient, peaceful and attractive to certain types of investors.
So, why must you guys, the so-called liberal democrats and constitutional monarchists, protest?
The answer, in a nut shell, is elections distinguish a government from a mafia or triad.
Reporters have been asking this question: Is Penanti another referendum?
My take is this: elections become a referendum only when a decision on personnel transform into a decision on issue.
In other words, it must be dominated by a single issue, and arguably one of national significance.
While real referendums can have more than one question on the ballot, a metaphorical referendum cannot. If you can interpret the outcome in many ways, you can’t call it a referendum.
However, referendum or not, by-elections are “mid-term” elections, like “mid-term examinations”. They can always serve as a barometer of the popular mood even if they dont begin as a referendum.
It’s Najib who needs no more by-elections, not even for the PR-held seats which offer a chance for BN to recover lost ground. Why? He does not have confidence of his own chance.
Money politics no longer works. Threat no longer works.
But Malaysia needs two more by-elections. To be precise, two by-elections for BN-held state seats in Perak. Here are the list of the seats that you can choose for: